radiation to right breast what can it do to the liver

abril 07, 2022 Postar um comentário

Clinical presentation

This 62-yr-one-time female patient presented via the breast screening plan with a lesion in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast. The tumour was surgically removed via wide local excision and a picket lymph node biopsy was carried out. Histology showed a 12-mm class I infiltrating tubular cancer with associated low-course ductal carcinoma in situ and no vascular invasion. Surgical margins were clear and the lookout node was non involved with the tumour. The tumour was staged as T1N0M0 and was determined to be oestrogen-receptor positive and HER2 negative. Afterward surgery, the patient received adjuvant endocrine therapy and a course of radical radiotherapy was prescribed for the conserved correct breast to reduce the risk of recurrence.

Investigations/imaging findings

Radiotherapy planning using CT simulation was initially carried out in free breathing (FB) with the patient in the supine position on a Quest RT-4543 breastboard (Q Fix Systems, Avondale, PA). A GE Lightspeed RT xvi scanner (General Electrical, Fairfield, CT) was used to generate screw CT images with slice thickness of 2.5 mm. The CT data sets were transferred to the Eclipse™ planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) through a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine network. A forwards-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) handling programme was prepared by trained dosimetrists in conjunction with the treating clinician. A field-in-field arroyo was used, incorporating three medial and three lateral tangential beams, integrating a mix of 6 and x MV beams, to provide a homogenous dose distribution throughout the breast tissue to a prescribed total dose of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions. Plans were produced according to International Committee on Radiations Units guidelines to attain 95% isodose coverage to the clinical target volume (CTV), limiting the maximum isodose to 105% of the prescribed dose. The CTV encompassed the whole intact breast and chest wall, including the soft tissues of the deep pectoral fascia, within the back edge of tangential fields and clinical pare marks of established treatment fields using Radiations Therapy Oncology Group chest cancer contouring atlas definitions.^ane The medial border was defined by the midline sternum–rib junction, and the lateral border as ane cm below the breast plate or to the midaxillary line, excluding the latissimus dorsi musculus. The superior edge was placed at the 2d intercostal space at the level of the bending of Louis and the junior edge was 1–ii cm below the extent of CT-apparent chest tissue. A planning target volume expansion was not applied. The center, liver and both ipsilateral lung (iLung) and contralateral lung (cLung) were outlined and treated equally organs at run a risk (OAR), applying stringent mandatory low-dose constraints to the heart and lungs [eye volume receiving >13 Gy (Five_13 Gy) <10%, iLung volume receiving >18 Gy (V_{eighteen Gy}) <15%, cLung volume receiving >2.five Gy (Five_ii.5 Gy) <xv%] as adult for the IMPORT high trial.² The FB planning scan (Effigy 1) showed an unusually large volume of normal liver located in the loftier-dose target area (134 cc). Given wide guidelines suggesting ≤v% radiations-induced liver disease (RILD) risk with a mean liver dose of ≤30–32 Gy,³ the doses to this partial liver volume were unlikely to accept clinical relevance for the development of RILD in this case. However, the liver radiations associated with the FB plan was considered undesirable for this excellent prognosis patient, every bit well as beingness discordant with our aims to minimize all OAR radiation while ensuring adept target coverage. Transient post-radiotherapy changes in liver function tests and radiographic reductions in liver density are besides reported to exist common where the liver is incidentally irradiated.^three A method to reduce the dose to the liver was therefore sought. Although middle and lung toxicity is widely addressed in the current literature,^4–nine radiation-associated liver toxicity is recognized^three but not well studied in relation to breast radiotherapy. We plant only i report on liver sparing in right-chest cancer—a planning study that concluded fantabulous liver sparing in right chest cancer using deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH).¹⁰ A DIBH technique, using three-dimensional (3D) surface monitoring for automated beam-hold delivery, has been developed for use at our clinic to reduce incidental eye dose in suitable left breast cancer patients. The potential benefits and suitability of the patient for DIBH radiotherapy delivery technique were therefore investigated. The patient later underwent a repeat radiotherapy planning CT simulation browse in the DIBH position (Figure 2). DIBH resulted in considerable deportation of the liver away from the high-dose target region, such that the book of liver in the high-dose region was reduced by 63% to 50 cc. A full treatment program was generated on the Eclipse planning system in exactly the same way as was the FB plan to compare the dosimetric statistics of the two plans (Table i). All liver dose metrics were substantially reduced with the DIBH programme, with the volume of liver receiving ≥xxx Gy (V_30 Gy) reduced by 64%. Middle dose metrics showed negligible differences betwixt the two plans. Some lung dose metrics generated by the planning arrangement using dose–volume data showed increases with DIBH compared with FB. As lung mass typically decreases past approximately twoscore% in DIBH, it is best-selling that dose–mass information may have aided the assessment of lung dose with variable inflation.^ix However, in all cases, lung dose metrics remained below the low threshold prophylactic limits imposed.² Every bit animate motion is eliminated with DIBH technique, the set-upwardly was anticipated to exist optimal without the need for all-encompassing immobilization (based on experience with other patients), and the patient fulfilled all eligibility criteria developed at our clinic for our DIBH radiotherapy delivery technique (Table 2), the DIBH treatment programme was judged to be overall more favourable and was therefore selected for treatment.

Figure 1. — Figure ane.
Free-animate transverse (a) and sagittal (b) planning CT images from Eclipse™ planning organisation (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). The delineated liver (light yellow contour line), right lung (dark yellow profile line), left lung (orange contour line) and center (pink contour line) are shown in relation to the target field. A big volume of liver is within the target field, including in the high 95% isodose region (bright green contour line).

Figure 2. — Figure ii.
Deep inspiration breath-hold transverse (a) and sagittal (b) planning CT images from the Eclipse™ planning system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). The liver (light xanthous contour line) is displaced inferiorly and posteriorly away from the high 95% isodose handling surface area (bright dark-green contour line) as the right (dark yellow contour line) and left lung (magenta contour line) are fully inflated.

**Table 1. Summary of OAR dosimetrics for FB and DIBH plans**
OAR (data generated by Eclipse⁻ planning system)		FB	DIBH	Deviation (%)
Liver	Volume within target field	133.98 cc	50.sixteen cc	−63.00
	Mean dose	iv.8 Gy	2.6 Gy	−46.00
	Maximum dose	twoscore.0 Gy	38.6 Gy	−3.v
	5_30 Gy	six.ix cc	two.5 cc	−64.00
	V_twenty Gy	8.1 cc	three.4 cc	−58.00
	V_x Gy	9.half-dozen cc	4.seven cc	−51.00
Heart	Mean dose	0.4 Gy	0.4 Gy	±0.00
	Maximum dose	2.i Gy	two.2 Gy	+5.0
Right lung	Mean dose	5.1 Gy	seven.0 Gy	+37.00
	Maximum dose	39.one Gy	39.2 Gy	+0.26
	V_xxx Gy	five.9	10.four	+76.00
	Five_xx Gy	seven.7	12.nine	+67.00
	5_10 Gy	10.iv	17.i	+64.00
Left lung	Mean dose	0.02 Gy	0.04 Gy	+100.00
	Maximum dose	0.4 Gy	0.vi Gy	+l.00

**Tabular array 2. Summary of screening criteria used for application of DIBH technique at Harley Street Clinic Radiotherapy Department**
Potential benefit of DIBH method	• OAR in gratuitous-breath handling field that is expected to be displaced by DIBH
No alternative method to improve planning dosimetry	• Multi-leaf collimation considered as unsuitable/inferior alternative
Adequate DIBH breast breathing reproducibility	• Patient instructed in 20 due south DIBH and supervised through several practices • Patient able to follow breath-concord instructions • Regular rib muzzle ascent and fall seen when anterior tattoo displacement measured on breastboard scale
No patient-specific factors that would compromise DIBH setup reproducibility	• Sufficient shoulder movement, comfortable lying flat, stable breast tissue etc.
Do good of DIBH method confirmed	• Planning CT in DIBH shows OAR displacement

Handling

The patient was treated within xx days co-ordinate to the DIBH forwards-IMRT handling plan. Radiotherapy was delivered with a Trilogy™ Linac (Varian Medical Systems UK Ltd., Crawley, UK). During treatment, a 3D surface imaging system (AlignRT® Beam-Hold; VisionRT Ltd., London, UK) was used to attain a stable, reproducible breath-hold position and track real-time patient motion in vi degrees-of-liberty. The AlignRT organisation communicates direct with the Varian Linac to activate "Axle-Hold" when a patient'south position falls out of tolerance with the planned CT scan. Video goggles were used to provide the patient with visual feedback and coaching for DIBH reproducibility and stability.8 Pre-treatment medial field verification epitome was performed daily using the PortalVision™ MV system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) with images matched online using a tolerance of 0.5 cm.

Issue and follow-upwards

The patient completed all treatment fractions on the DIBH plan as scheduled, with no difficulties experienced. The only acute side outcome experienced was mild erythema in the handling area. No liver, lung or heart side effects were reported up to 6 months later treatment.

Learning points

Adverse effects of chest cancer treatment have become increasingly of import equally survivorship has improved. Techniques to minimize dose to adjacent OAR are necessary to lower risks.
DIBH methods have been developed and practical primarily to reduce centre dose in left breast cancer because of the known risks of cardiac toxicity.^4,6–8 During DIBH, the heart and upper abdominal organs are displaced away from the treatment field.
DIBH may be appropriate for some correct breast cancer patients where high book of liver tissue in the treatment field results in suboptimal protection of the organ from incidental radiations.^3,10 To our cognition, this is the first study of a gated DIBH technique applied to treat a right breast cancer patient specifically to reduce liver dose.
Suitability for DIBH should exist judged on an individual patient footing. Adventure of liver side effects may vary with co-morbidity (e.g. hepatitis/poor liver function) and concurrent chemotherapy,ⁱⁱⁱ individual anatomical differences contribute to variable proportional do good of DIBH and patient suitability and compliance can bear on DIBH technique reproducibility.
The additional advantages of the DIBH technique used are optimal set-upwardly without the demand for all-encompassing immobilization and the emptying of animate motion, which may amend optimization of the dose distribution calculation and the accuracy of RT delivery. The associated challenges of the technique include: the need for patient pick and an boosted CT scan, the fiscal and space implications for extra equipment required and the additional fourth dimension required for staff training, patient coaching and daily quality balls.

Acknowledgments

This work was undertaken every bit part of ongoing treatment development and assessment at The Harley Street Clinic inside the auspices of HCA International. The back up of radiographers, medical physicists, dosimetrists and radiations oncologists at The Harley Street Dispensary Radiotherapy Department is gratefully best-selling—particularly Andrew Edwards and Stephanie Houghton—for their contributions to the development of the DIBH technique, successful treatment commitment and helpful discussions.

References

i. RTOG. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Breast Cancer Contouring Atlas . Available from: http://www.rtog.org/CoreLab/ContouringAtlases/BreastCancerAtlas.aspx
2. Donovan EM, , Ciurlionis L, , Fairfoul J, , James H, , Mayles H, , Manktelow South, , et al.. Planning with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and tomotherapy to modulate dose across chest to reflect recurrence hazard (IMPORT High trial). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 79: 1064–72.
3. Pan CC, , Kavanagh BD, , Dawson LA, , Li XA, , Das SK, , Miften G, , et al.. Quantitative analysis of normal tissue effects in the clinic: radiation-associated liver injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76: S94–100.
4. Bruzzaniti V, , Allay A, , Pinnarò P, , D'Andrea M, , Infusino E, , Landoni V, , et al.. Dosimetric and clinical advantages of deep inspiration jiff-hold (dIBH) during radiotherapy of chest cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2013; 32: 88
five. Butler LE, , Forster KM, , Stevens CW, , Bloch C, , Liu HH, , Tucker SL, , et al.. Dosimetric benefits of respiratory gating: a preliminary written report. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2004; 5: xvi–24.
vi. Hayden AJ, , Rains M, , Tiver Thou and . Deep inspiration breath concur technique reduces heart dose from radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2012; 56: 464–72.
7. Nissen Hard disk drive, , Appelt AL and . Improved middle, lung and target dose with deep inspiration breath hold in a large clinical serial of breast cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2013; 106: 28–32.
viii Vikstrom J, , Hjelstuen MH, , Mjaaland I, , Dybvik KI and . Cardiac and pulmonary dose reduction for tangentially irradiated breast cancer, utilizing deep inspiration breath-concur with acoustic guidance, without compromising target coverage. Acta Oncol 2011; 50: 42–50. doi: ten.3109/0284186X.2010.512923
9. Zurl B, , Stranzl H, , Winkler P, , Kapp KS and . Quantitative assessment of irradiated lung volume and lung mass in breast cancer patients treated with tangential fields in combination with deep inspiration breath concur (DIBH). Strahlenther Onkol 2010; 186: 157–62.
x. Prabhakar R, , Tharmar G, , Julka PK, , Rath GK, , Joshi RC, , Bansal AK, , et al.. Touch on of different breathing conditions on the dose to surrounding normal structures in tangential field chest radiotherapy. J Med Phys 2007; 32: 24–8.